Free Community College Proposals on the Rise

The introduction of federal legislation to make free community college a reality nationwide and the passage of legislation to implement free community college in Oregon, builds on efforts to remove any financial barriers to a two-year education.

Earlier this year President Obama laid out a similar idea; Tennessee was the first state to implement a policy of free community college at the state level.    Other states such as Minnesota and Washington have implemented proposals to reduce tuition at community and technical colleges, with Washington being the only state at the present time to implement a tuition reduction for public baccalaureate institutions as well.

Higher Education on the 2016 Presidential Trail

There is a great deal of focus on postsecondary education on the trail to the White House in 2016.  Many of the presidential candidates, on both sides of the aisle, have shared their thoughts and plans for higher education, including Jeb BushHillary Clinton, Ted Cruz, Martin O’Malley, Marco Rubio, and Bernie Sanders.

Common themes among the candidates thus far include:

  • Student Debt
  • Student Completion Rates
  • Free Tuition
  • Rising College and University Costs
  • Accreditation
  • Degree Earnings

Stay tuned!

Free Community College Legislation to Be Introduced in Congress

Reports this week state that U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and U.S. Representative Bobby Scott (D-VA) will introduce legislation to make community college free for low-income students.

The America’s College Promise Act will provide a federal match of $3 for every $1 invested by states to waive tuition and fees at community, technical and tribal colleges.  The bill expands on President Obama’s proposal by creating an affordable path to a baccalaureate degree, by covering a significant portion of the cost of two years of college for low-income students who attend qualifying minority-serving institutions, such as historically black colleges and universities.

The sponsors envision a federal investment of $79.7 billion over the next decade.

Some of the primary features of the bill include:

  • Funds would be awarded to states, upon submission of an accepted application. States would have to commit to “maintenance of effort” equal to or exceeding their average spending on public higher education, including student financial assistance, for the three previous years.  States also would have to provide a 25% match.
  • Available funds would be distributed to states according to their proportion of eligible students nationally.
  • States would have to commit to certain “evidence-based institutional reforms and innovative practices to improve student outcomes.”  There is not an explicit mandate that any one reform be undertaken, and they are largely consistent with ongoing community college reforms. Alignment between K–12 and postsecondary education, as well as 2- and 4- year public institutions, is also required.
  • The bill would mandate that state recipients allocate a portion of funding for public institutions of higher education, including 4-year colleges, on performance. No specific level is required.
  • States would receive a payment for each eligible student.  They would receive 75% of the national average community college tuition and fees for residents.  Funds could not increase each year beyond 3% or the average in-state tuition increase across the sector.
  • Students would automatically qualify for a full tuition waiver for two academic years or their equivalent if they enroll in programs that can fully transfer via articulation agreement toward a bachelor’s or post-bachelor’s degree at a public institution in the state or are enrolled in an occupational skills training program that leads to a recognized postsecondary credential that is in an in-demand industry sector or occupation in the state.
  • Only first-time students who maintain satisfactory academic progress would be eligible. Students would have to be enrolled on an at least half-time basis.   (The legislation eschews the 2.5 grade point average and financial eligibility cap proposed by the administration.)
  • States would ratably reduce their support for students if the funds available were not sufficient to cover all eligible students. Alternatively, if the funds provided to a state exceeded student eligibility, funds could be used for other purposes, such as extending benefits to non-first-time students, program improvement, college readiness, and dual enrollment.
  • The legislation provides mandatory, i.e., guaranteed, funding, but it is not “paid for,” meaning that no budgetary reduction or revenue increase has been identified to cover its considerable cost. Until an offset is identified, the legislation does not have a viable path to enactment.
  • The legislation also includes a much smaller section that provides assistance for students attending 4-year Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs). Many of the other provisions in this section are modeled along the lines of the community college section, although eligible students would have to be low-income. Significantly, community college transfer-in students could be supported. Funding for this portion of the legislation is about one-eighth the size of the community college section.

New Report Highlights Extent of Student Transfer in Higher Education

Of the 3.6 million students who entered college for the first time in fall 2008, over one third (37.2 percent) transferred to a different institution at least once within six years, according to a new report released yesterday from the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.  This builds off of a similar report issued in 2012.

Other findings include:

  • Student mobility often involves out-of-state transfers. Nearly one in five transfers among students who started in two-year public institutions, and nearly a quarter of transfers from four-year public institutions, occurred across state lines.
  • Mixed enrollment students (those who enrolled both full- and part-time) had the highest transfer and mobility rates at 53.7 percent. Changing institutions and changing enrollment statuses both appear to be strategies that students employ in reaction to their changing circumstances.
  • Exclusively part-time students, who are typically more geographically constrained and most likely to stop out of college altogether, had the lowest transfer rate (11.9 percent).
  • Two-year public institutions are the top mobility destination for students who start in four-year institutions. More than half (51.3 percent) of those transferring from a four-year public institution moved to a two-year public institution. Over 40 percent of those who transferred from four-year private institutions headed to community colleges.
  • A quarter of all student mobility from four-year institutions to community colleges consisted of summer swirlers, who returned to their starting institution in the following fall term. This strategy was found, in an earlier Clearinghouse report, to be correlated to higher degree completion rates at the starting four-year institution.

Statewide transfer agreements in our state allow students to transfer to universities with two years of college-level coursework with general education requirements already completed. In fact, Washington students transfer with an associate degree and earn bachelor’s degrees at much higher rates than students nationally. Transfer students from our state’s community and technical colleges earn 40% of all bachelor’s degrees at Washington public colleges and universities. A snapshot of Washington’s successful system of student transfer can be found on our website.

The New Front-Runner: Millennials

Millennials now represent one quarter of the nation’s population. According to a recent U.S. Census Bureau report Millennials (83.1 million) – born between 1982-2000 – surpass Baby Boomers (75.4 million).

Millennials are more diverse than preceding generations, with 44.2 percent identifying as part of a minority race or ethnic group.

Even more diverse than Millennials is the yet unnamed generation of Americans, those younger than five years old.  This generation was the first to become majority-minority with 50.2 percent part of a minority race or ethnic group.